DEAR EDITOR:

It is astonishing how deeply negative, derogatory comments can impact a person’s reputation — especially when individuals repeat these remarks without forethought or any curiosity to investigate their validity. Such is the case with Charlie Kirk, a man who has been unfairly vilified by critics. A person of deep faith, Kirk offered an open platform to anyone willing to challenge his views in public, hoping to engage in meaningful dialogue about faith and values. Many of these conversations involved individuals who embraced secular perspectives, advocating for ideas such as acceptance of diverse sexual orientation, support for abortion, stricter gun control and the rejection of biblical teachings centered in Jesus Christ. Yet, Kirk stood firm in defending the freedoms guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution while prioritizing faith in God.

A free society cannot exist without free speech. How, then, can anyone who has watched Kirk’s debates call him a fascist? To make such a claim, one must first understand what fascism entails — and it’s clear that many of his critics do not. Offering an open mic to those who disagree with him is the antithesis of fascism. Likewise, accusations of racism against Kirk fall flat. Can anyone who had listened to an entire debate or speech point to a single racist remark? His discussions were grounded in facts and reason, not prejudice.

Charlie Kirk was a gifted communicator — able to debate with clarity, truth and impressive command of facts. At just 31, his sharp mind, extensive knowledge of current events and deep understanding of biblical principles made him a standout figure.

He remains a bright light in a world that often conflates acceptance with compassion and embraces immorality as progress. Kirk’s wisdom, focus and ability to connect with younger generations stemmed from his unwavering faith and intellectual rigor.

I can’t recall feeling such a profound sense of loss for someone I didn’t personally know. I only listened to his debates and watched how he responded — with respect — to each and every person with whom he interacted. This is an enormous spiritual loss for our country: to lose such a brilliant individual who was able to connect with so many people across both the spiritual and political spectrum.

As a final note, I strongly oppose any politician who seeks to restrict free speech. If late-night talk show hosts choose to spew divisive rhetoric, they should feel free to do so. In a free, capitalist society, supply and demand will ultimately determinate what resonates with audiences. I believe most people are weary of hate will gravitate toward voices of reason and truth — like Charlie Kirk. We were truly blessed to have Charlie Kirk, a true man of faith and conviction.

TIM SANTELL

Kinsman