DEAR EDITOR:

I am writing to share my insights regarding the planned removal of the dams along the Mahoning river.

My family has deep roots in Warren, dating back to when my grandfather and great uncle established Thumm’s Tire Shop in 1909. Having been born and raised in Warren, I possess a profound connection to both the community and the river.

I spent my formative years on the west side of Warren, working at our family business, Thumm’s Bike Shop, located on the bank of the Mahoning River. This river has always been a significant part of my life, providing countless hours of enjoyment, from skipping stones to contemplating its natural beauty. The river has also taught me the realities of living alongside it, including the challenges posed by flooding.

After a 37-year career away from Warren, my family and I returned seven years ago, drawn by the desire to create a nurturing environment for our two young children. Upon my return, I learned about the decision to restore the Mahoning River to its natural state. This initiative will facilitate the river’s natural flow, allowing fish to spawn and swim upstream — an essential process that the current low-head dams obstruct. Furthermore, the removal of these dams will create opportunities for various recreational activities such as canoeing, kayaking and fishing, providing immediate and long-term benefits for our community and future generations.

From what I’ve learned, historically, the low dams were constructed over a century ago with little consideration for environmental impact, primarily serving industrial needs, such as supplying water to factories like Republic Steel and generating hydroelectric power at the Summit Street Electric Plant. Additionally, for decades, the city and surrounding villages discharged sewage directly into the Mahoning River, exacerbating environmental issues. Recent improvements, including the installation of city sewers to replace outdated septic systems, align with the goals of the dam removals by enhancing living standards and protecting the environment in Warren.

The recent political discourse surrounding this issue has been disheartening. I believe there is no valid argument for maintaining the dams. The contracts for their removal have been in place for several years and are legally binding. If these contracts are breached, the contracted third parties scheduled to commence demolition could pursue legal action for damages, which is entirely justified. Furthermore, the legal liabilities associated with retaining the dams could lead to future lawsuits stemming from potential accidents related to the dam’s undertow — an issue that has already manifested, as evidenced by a tragic incident at the Summit Street dam a few years ago that resulted in a wrongful death settlement.

In conclusion, I encourage all stakeholders to consider the numerous success stories stemming from low-head dam removals in western Pennsylvania 10 or more years ago which illustrate the positive outcomes of such initiatives. The removal of these dams will undoubtedly benefit Trumbull County, enhancing both its environment and recreational opportunities.

GREG THUMM

Warren