The Democratic Socialists of America has a class problem that its own rhetoric is designed to obscure. Its rising stars — Zohran Mamdani, son of a Columbia professor and an acclaimed filmmaker; the Ivy-credentialed activists staffing progressive nonprofits; the heirs animating the movement’s core — reveal a pattern the movement cannot honestly explain. The face of American socialism is increasingly young, college-credentialed, and conspicuously well-bred. This is not coincidence. It is structure.

The pattern is older than the DSA. Engels co-authored the Communist Manifesto while running his father’s textile mill. Marx married into Prussian nobility and lived on Engels’s industrial fortune. Lenin’s father held hereditary status under the tsar. Castro was the son of one of Cuba’s largest landowners. The proletariat has rarely led its own revolutions; the bourgeoisie’s disaffected sons have. The pattern is not accidental.

What socialism reliably produces is not equality but a closed caste. The Soviet nomenklatura had its sealed stores, hospitals, and dachas. The Chinese Communist Party’s “princelings” — Xi Jinping among them — inherited position as straightforwardly as any Habsburg. North Korea has produced three generations of Kims; the Castros gave Cuba six decades of dynastic rule. Every long-running communist regime has frozen its founding elite into a hereditary aristocracy. The system that promised to abolish class only ever abolished the class mobility that threatens its rulers.

The free market is the most ruthlessly meritocratic mechanism humans have devised. Joseph Schumpeter called it “creative destruction” — the process by which yesterday’s titans are unseated by tomorrow’s strivers, the immigrant eclipsing the inherited fortune. Capitalism does not care who your father was.

Socialism is the escape. Replace the market’s verdict with the committee’s, and the credentials, connections, and cultural fluencies accumulated since prep school become decisive. The Harvard PhD is not displaced by an HVAC contractor in a system that allocates by ideological vocabulary and bureaucratic capture. The nonprofit, the agency, the university, the foundation — the institutions that the inherited elite already dominates — are precisely the ones a socialist order empowers.

But empowerment requires a mandate, and the inherited radical cannot rule in the name of his own privilege. So he manufactures a constituency and crowns himself its head. This is the function of the grievance apparatus: he survives by persuading others they are victims of an irredeemable society, and that he, the credentialed interpreter of their suffering, is the one fit to lead them out.

This is the buried logic behind the doctrine that the bourgeoisie are the villains. The middle class is denounced not because it oppresses the worker but because it is the living refutation of the whole arrangement — the shopkeeper, the contractor, the immigrant family that built a business from nothing, the people who prove grievance is not destiny.

It is why the same movement has rallied behind Graham Platner in Maine, the progressive favorite.Platner campaigns as a “working-class Mainer,” an oysterman in salt-stained authenticity — and the costume does the work. His grandfather, Warren Platner, was a celebrated architect who designed the dining room atop the World Trade Center. His father, a Dartmouth-educated attorney, has given some $60,000 to Democrats — and lent his son $200,000 to buy his house, a purchase Platner long implied was financed by the VA. He attended the $75,000-a-year Hotchkiss School. This is not the biography of a man the market forgot. It is a man insulated from it, now asking working Mainers to make him their tribune on the strength of a victimhood he has never lived.

Socialism is an insurance policy: dressed as equality, sold as liberation, and structured, always, to keep the right families on top.

Erick Erickson is a blogger and radio talk-show host.