Trending
JACKSON HOLE, Wyo. (AP) -- Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh said Friday that inflation is still too high and suggested the central bank may have to raise interest rates in the coming months to bring it down, a clearer signal than he has previously sent about his economic outlook.
In his first high-profile speech at the Fed's annual conference in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, Warsh acknowledged that recent U.S. reports show that inflation has cooled a bit, but "they do not tell me that underlying trends have meaningfully improved."
"We must be confident that underlying inflation is moving to our objective, clearly and at sufficient speed," Warsh said. "Otherwise, we have work to do."
The comments from the new Fed chair appeared to reassure Wall Street that fighting inflation remains the priority for the central bank. Warsh did not imply that a rate hike is imminent, but he appeared to dismiss perceptions that inflation is no longer a threat.
He pointed to data showing that inflation remains stubbornly above the central bank's 2% target. Warsh replaced Jerome Powell in late May after his predecessor's term ended.
The U.S. stock market held steady after the speech, but expectations are building in the bond market for the Fed to hike interest rates. The yield on the two-year Treasury, which closely tracks expectations for what the Fed will do with its federal funds rate, moved from 4.22% to 4.30%, a sign that investors expect short-term yields to move higher.
Longer-term yields on 10-year and 30-year Treasuries were mostly flat, suggesting investors aren't worried that higher rates will be needed for a long stretch of time to fight inflation.
Jon Faust, an economist at Johns Hopkins and a former adviser to Powell, said Warsh succeeded in conveying a tougher approach on inflation while avoiding the kind of detailed guidance from the Fed that he has disparaged.
"He found a way to convey that if necessary he would support raising rates, which is one thing people were concerned about," Faust said.
Yet Michael Strain, director of economic policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute, said the Fed chair has talked tough on inflation before without hiking the Fed's key rate. His Friday remarks don't provide any clearer guidance on the timing of any Fed moves, he added.
The Fed chair faced high stakes with his speech as questions swirled around Wall Street about whether he was sufficiently focused on fighting inflation. At a press conference July 29 he sowed confusion about whether he would back up his previous tough talk on rising prices with any action, such as lifting the Fed's short-term rate, which is currently about 3.6%.
Those concerns may have contributed to rising bond yields, which can increase the cost of borrowing for the government and everyone else. Yet Warsh has said he doesn't want to provide what analysts call "forward guidance" about whether the Fed will hike or cut rates or stay on hold at upcoming meetings. He argues that it limits the Fed's flexibility by committing it to a specific policy.
Yet some economists have argued that he could say more about his views on Fed policy without tipping his hand about future actions.
Warsh on Friday reiterated his skepticism about providing such guidance or even outlining his broad approach to interest-rate policy.
But he did suggest that interest rates currently aren't restricting economic activity, pointing to robust business investment in AI equipment and infrastructure and strong consumer spending. As a rule of thumb, interest rates often need to be high enough to limit borrowing and spending to cool inflation.
The Fed next meets Sept. 15-16, and Warsh's remarks don't necessarily signal that the central bank will raise rates then. Wall Street investors now see the chances of a rate hike at the Fed's Sept. 15-16 meeting as basically a coin flip, according to futures pricing tracked by CME FedWatch, up from about one-third before Warsh spoke.
Warsh said inflation data "are more concerning" than trends in the job market, where the unemployment rate is low. He also argued that inflation is unlikely to move back to the target on its own.