Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Place An Ad | Home RSS
What's Trending »
 
 
 

Local citizens react to high court's gun decision

June 27, 2008
Staff, wire reports<*p(0.0,10.0,0.0,10.4,0,0,g)*L>Protecting oneself against those same ‘‘bad guys’’ is paramount to the Secon

Protecting oneself against those same ''bad guys'' is paramount to the Second Amendment, says Todd Garland, owner of Rattlesnake Hill Sporting Goods in Newton Falls.

''To sum it up, the bad guys have guns,'' said Garland, who also teaches gun safety and permit classes. ''As good, law-abiding citizens, we should be able to defend ourselves.''

In the Supreme Court's first ruling on gun rights under the Second Amendment, the justices on Thursday struck down a handgun ban on the books in the District of Columbia. Weighing in on an argument for the ages, the court affirmed 5-4 that an individual right to gun ownership exists and, in this case, it allows people to have guns in their home for self-defense.

How far that right extends is an argument for another day.

The mix-and-match nature of gun laws presents a problem for gun users, Garland said.

''There isn't a universal law. Every city, state or town can have different rules about registering guns,'' Garland said. ''I tell my students in the concealed carry classes that they have a permit to carry a firearm in Ohio, but if they go to Pennsylvania, it's different.''

Warren police Detective Michael Currington said he was not surprised by the Supreme Court's decision since the right to bear arms has been guaranteed by the Constitution for 200 years. However, he was surprised at the close 5-4 vote on the issue.

He said Washington, D.C., has one of the strictest gun control laws in the nation, but its crime rate also is among the highest. Currington said that shows gun control laws do not deter crime.

''Guns do not cause or create crime. People do,'' he said.

Warren police Chief John Mandopoulos said he thought the court's decision was split along ideological lines, but he was doubtful that it would change the way of life in Trumbull County.

''It's not going to affect us around here either way. We have no ban on handguns in the home,'' he said.

Lt. Joseph Marhulik, who supervises the department's firearms qualification program, said the Supreme Court's decision won't have much of an effect locally.

''I support the Constitution. If people want to target practice and have guns in their home, the Constitution says they can. That's part of what makes this a great country,'' Marhulik said.

Garland's comments were mirrored by Falls police Chief Robert Carlson.

''The people who shouldn't have guns are the ones that got them. It (the ruling) gives people that obey the law the right to have them,'' Carlson said.

Protecting constitutional rights is also important to Everett Radcliffe Jr. of Warren, who serves as vice president of the Vienna Fish and Game Club.

''It's a right in the Constitution that we have,'' Radcliffe said. ''And when people want power, the first thing they do is disarm the population.''

Historically, Radcliffe said certain phenomena simply can't be legislated against.

''Laws won't stop criminals. We tried it with whiskey, Prohibition and prostitution. You just can't legislate those types of things.''

Ohio politicians including Gov. Ted Strickland are hailing the U.S. Supreme Court's decision that Americans have a right to keep guns for self-defense.

In a statement, Strickland said the court understands that the right to bear arms is as fundamental as free speech and the right to vote.

Democratic Ohio Congressman Zack Space called the court's 5-4 ruling a victory for gun owners everywhere.

 
 

 

I am looking for:
 
 

Article Photos

Tribune Chronicle photo / Steve Schenck

Todd Garland, owner of the Rattlesnake Hill Sporting Goods store in Newton Falls, holds a Glock Model 23 .40-caliber firearm.