Mobile Version: mobile.tribtoday.com
RSS:
Warren Weather Forecast, OH
Member Login: Email: Password:
Search: Local News Classified Web
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Columnists
  • Virtual Newsroom
  • Community Stars
  • YouTube
  • Stocks and Lottery
  • Pirates Report
  • Virtual Job Fair
  • All About Green

Dann aide tried to rescind resignation

By STEPHEN ORAVECZ Tribune Chronicle
POSTED: May 17, 2008

The employee who had an affair with former Attorney General Marc Dann tried to withdraw her resignation and has threatened to sue the office.

The Attorney Generalás Office released e-mail messages Friday from Jessica Utovich, Dannás former scheduler, seeking clarification about her job status and other documents. On two occasions, Utovich objected to her treatment and in one message, claims the office was retaliating against her for the affair.

Attempts to contact Utovich were unsuccessful, and a message seeking comment was left with the Attorney Generalás Office.

First Assistant Attorney General Thomas R. Winters announced May 2 that Utovich had resigned effective May 8. That was the day Winters and Executive Assistant Attorney General Ben Espy announced three top aides had lost their jobs due to the sexual harassment scandal that led to Dannás resignation this week.

At 9:45 p.m. that night, Utovich sent an e-mail message saying Dann had verbally agreed to let her stay on the job. The message went to several officials, including Winters, Epsy, Dann and Paula L. Paoletti, interim chief of staff.

It reads in part, "Yesterday afternoon, I resigned from my position. This came after a promised conversation did not occur. After talking with various members of the office ä including Marc, who expressed that he did not want me to resign ä I made the decision to rescind my resignation."

Utovich said in the message that she had talked to Patrick McLean, chief financial officer, who told her that if Dann had OK'd her decision to stay, that would overrule Winters' statement that she had quit.

Referring to someone she did not name, Utovich wrote, "He (Marc) apparently stated `its (sic) fine and she'll be getting another job, someone will call her. That Tom `had Marc in a situation' and Marc couldnát do anything."

On May 7, Paoletti informed Utovich that despite a conversations she had about staying on the job, her resignation "was effective upon receipt."

Utovich responded, "Thank you and I will take this matter up with my attorneys. As I did officially rescind my resignation to the highest authority in the office, and it was verbally communicated that it was accepted."

Utovich added, "I am appalled by the treatment shown to me, as over the past five months, I have been nothing but loyal and a hard worker. Iám not proud of my actions in my personal life, but do not deserve to be retaliated for them by the office."

Utovich went through routine exit procedures prior to her last day of work. However, on her employee exit questionnaire, a statement on the bottom is blacked out. The attorney general's office released a sworn statement from Douglas P. Harvey, deputy finance director, that he redacted the statement at Utovichás request.

In an addendum, the office states the redacted material can still be read on the original document. It says, "You work at the Attorney General's Office until its (sic) no longer convenient for them to let you work there. I had rescinded my resignation."



soravecz@tribune-chronicle.com

Member Comments
View Comments: | 1-7 | Post a comment
VoiceOfReason
05-17-08 9:42 PM
Pandora, maybe you misunderstood my original comment – read it again. Who did I refer to as victims? And technically speaking, if the resignation was rescinded and accepted, she has a job. Don’t believe it, wait for the court decision and comment on the future article.

VoiceOfReason
05-17-08 9:36 PM
Oh contraire Tonelli. I believe the justice system disagrees with you as well. Or perhaps I’ve been reading different stories than you. I believe the sexual harassment has been proven - I’d call that a “victim” for at least two of the three women. Agreed Jessica isn’t a victim but certainly made bad choices, and in this case it certainly is true that it takes two to tango. For the record, Monica is modern day. And hanging out with your boss doesn’t imply all that you’ve stated; if so, don’t ever go out with your boss or your subordinates.

Tonelli
05-17-08 7:26 PM
Agreed, how innocent is she when she knew full well Marc Dann is married? Now suddenly she is worried about losing a good paying job, my guess is she engaged in the affair in an effort to slurp her way up the ladder in the AG's office. She's a modern day Monica Lewinsky, no one sexually harassed her, it was consensual and adulterous. None of these women were victimized, they were all in it for the good time, career advancement and to rub elbows with the big boys in Columbus.........

Pandora
05-17-08 6:57 PM
Victim? More like a homewrecker. She's not so innocent.

Judyann
05-17-08 6:54 AM
Good point! Thanks for pointing to the real issue, I respect you for it. I guess I come from the old school where it takes two to tango but harrassment is very much the issue here as is the incompetance.

VoiceOfReason
05-17-08 12:19 AM
Separate the personal thoughts. If she rescinded and it was accepted, she has a job. Why attack the girls (two who were victims by the way). Should everyone be fired? Let the investigation run its course. Remember that the affair itself isn't the issue, it was the harassment and incompetance in leadership.

Judyann
05-17-08 12:08 AM
If Dann leaves, she should too. The whole bunch of them should go. Even the ladies who filed the harrassment charges. They were all involved.

You must first login before you can comment.
Existing Member Login
Not a Member?
Create a Member Account  
*Your email address:
*Password:
    Forgot Password?
  Remember my email address.