Articles of impeachment filed against Dann
Tribune ChronicleArticle Links
» deposition transcripts and emailsThe nine charges against Dann based on sworn deposition testimony from the Attorney General’s internal investigation (Espy Report) and other statements. The articles include:
— Malfeasance and improper exercise of authority: Obstructed the investigation into allegations of sexual harassment within his office;
— Malfeasance: Willfully and intentionally issued misleading statements under oath;
— Nonfeasance and Gross Neglect of Duty: Neglected to perform the official duties of his office and, by his own admission, was not competent or qualified to execute the duties of the office of Attorney General;
— Nonfeasance and Neglect: Failed to exercise due care in the administration of the office because he knew or should have known his personal conduct contributed to and allowed the creation of a hostile work environment;
— Nonfeasance and Neglect: Failed to exercise due care to ensure the safety and security of state property;
— Nonfeasance and Neglect: Failed to investigate and prohibit improper use of state property;
— Nonfeasance and Neglect: Knew or should have known of the misuse of state property for personal business;
— Gross Neglect of Duty: Committed acts of gross neglect of duty by undermining the integrity of his office; bringing disrepute upon the office; betraying the public trust as Ohio’s chief law enforcement officer; undermining the effectiveness and efficiency of the office;
— Gross Immorality: Committed acts of gross immorality and knew or should have known that his personal conduct undermined the effectiveness and efficiency of the office.
The three representatives who drafted the articles said, ‘‘We promised the people of Ohio to end a culture of corruption that existed in the past, and we are fulfilling that promise by cleaning our own house when events and circumstances warrant.’’
|
Handala
|
|
|---|---|
|
05-13-08 8:44 PM
|
Clinton committed perjury (Criminal offense), was impeached and skated with a censure.That's how he got the "Slick Willy" title.They are not intrested in CENSURING Dann.They want him out and are willing to pass NEW laws to do it.It is setting a dagerous precedence. If you have a clause in your contract that states High Crimes and Misdemeanors you can't be fired for less.No Hmms? about it!Hmm?
|
|
concerned
|
|
|
05-13-08 3:12 PM
|
It is not an "IF" it is an "IS". A criminal offense is not required for impeachment. If you remember correctly, Bill Clinton was impeached. However, he was not removed from office. They are two different proceedings. Neither of which require a criminal offense. Does losing your job require a criminal offense? Hmmm?
|
|
Handala
|
|
|
05-13-08 3:09 PM
|
Concerned...Thank you for not calling me names or making fun of my name.I appreciate it and it reflects your maturity.
|
|
Handala
|
|
|
05-13-08 2:53 PM
|
If that were the case concerned the majority party would eliminate the minority!Or at least GWB!We are embarking on a new presedence that could lead to a state of anarchy.All in the name of...Aren't we wonderfool!Hmm?
|
|
concerned
|
|
|
05-13-08 2:30 PM
|
I criminal offense is not a prerequisite for impeachment. I don't know where you got that impression. You do not have to commit a crime to be removed from office. You can simply be impeached for a neglect of duty or any of the articles listed.
|
|
Handala
|
|
|
05-13-08 1:47 PM
|
I'm not a "D"schweck, don't know Dann and didn't beat a drum to get him elected.I do know the Democratic Party is opening a Pandoras box with this Inquisition and if Marc is Impeached the Democrats lose.If Marc beats the Tribunal the Democrats still lose.I have no doubt the Republicans are salivating with antisipation but they too are in a no win situation.Dann has yet to be charged with any crimminal offences and shouldn't be subjected to Impacment proceedings untill he has!Having an affair or as the Puritains say,"Gross Immorality" isn't a crime.Nor is hiring someone that attempts to be "Grossly Immorall!"Well it didn't use to be!Hmm?
|
|
cortlandmom
|
|
|
05-13-08 11:50 AM
|
Well, I guess we now know what they have on him. We will see how many people stand behind him now.
|
|
Handala
|
|
|
05-13-08 11:35 AM
|
The Party with no Hart...or sense!Can't wait to hear the vague mis...mal...nonfeasance charges!
|





