Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Place An Ad | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 

Attack on tea party had no factual basis

April 21, 2013

DEAR EDITOR: This is in response to the rambling, incoherent letter in last week’s Tribune Chronicle by Leif Damstoft. His attack on the Tea Party, all Republicans and specifically Se....

« Back to Article

 
 
sort: oldest | newest

Comments

(196)

featherstone

Apr-27-13 7:30 AM

Truthmonger, well said 11:47 comment.

That's a wrap for me, Marmablue. Hey, how do you carry that AK with your funny jacket that makes you hug yourself? Got pockets in that jacket for your meds?

Too much shock treatment on your brain bluparrotmel.

4 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

thediffrence

Apr-27-13 1:36 AM

Get a life!

3 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

truthmonger

Apr-26-13 11:52 PM

Brainwashed zombie conservatives' brains also have no factual basis. I guess to be fair and balanced, brainwashed liberal zombies have no factual basis either. Now that we've observed the truth, what do we do?

5 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

truthmonger

Apr-26-13 11:47 PM

Marmel-

Wake up and smell the coffee. The nations with the fewest ghettos on earth have the most well-balanced liberal and conservative politics, such as in Scandinavia. Not too liberal and not too conservative. By comparison these countries make America seem conservative as hell-o! Only an idiot would believe in some Utopian dream whether conservative or liberal. You and Zeck show what idiots you are every time you blame all things liberal and praise all things conservative.

Even in America, under the liberal policies of The New Deal, poverty had been steadily declining every decade while the economy grew slowly until Reaganomics was rammed down our throats by the 24/7 corporate media...ultimately for short term gains conservatives wanted to see the economy grow faster and looser with policies that give a bigger and bigger piece of the national pie to the top 1%...while growing the ghettos.

America needs balance, not more fanaticism from the left or right. Unplug your TV

6 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

ItIsntEasyBeingFree

Apr-26-13 9:43 PM

Featherneck, we tote our AKs, ARs, and rifles now!! Your opinion doesn't matter because we are protected by law! Get over it you lose!

2 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

featherstone

Apr-26-13 6:05 PM

Don't think your rebellion would ever happen. Is this idea a deflection of your gun control debate? I honestly think it is, just like some other repeated tactics you have Almost mastered.

Got to go.. BEER NIGHT!!

5 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

featherstone

Apr-26-13 5:59 PM

See, polls are Ok, but just like on this thread they can be taken differently by both sides AND I BELIEVE THIS MAY BE BY DESIGN!

That's where reasonable logic should take over, politics F everything up!

Is like to see a poll however on your prediction of this visionary rebellion against the government. Really like to see results on that one.

5 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

featherstone

Apr-26-13 5:54 PM

However there you American hero you,

Nor do I feel anybody should be toting Aks shotguns, high powered rifles around heavy populated areas, especially where children are.

Not sure on armed guards or teachers in schools, feel police officer is best answer, or Part of answer.

Nothing to do with freakin polls or politics! Just my humble thoughts.

5 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

featherstone

Apr-26-13 5:47 PM

It seams Marmel, you train of thought is YOUR EITHER 100% WITH ME, OR FLAT OUT AGAINST ME!!

I Don't care how many or what kind of guns anybody has as long as..

1. Person is mentally sound. (Hard to establish)

2. Of age and no history of Violent Felonies, ( don't believe non violent felons should necessarily be prohibited)

3. Nobody needs a drum on any weapon, or fully automatic, unless he/she is a collector.

4. Don't feel magazine capacity should be limited if other guidelines are met.

5 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

featherstone

Apr-26-13 5:38 PM

MARMALADE show me where I cited any polls.

I haven't! Only mentioned I believe in background cks and registration on every firearm bought. It is an opinion, has nothing to do with political party, or polls.

I also believe its ridiculous that the government will attempt to seize firearms AFTER THE MAJORITY ARE REGISTERED! Never happen..why? No way would Most do so. It would cause chaos, and again establishment doesn't fear registered non felony gun owners, at least the majority. I know what your rebuttal will be so....

If a gun owner Fails to secure a weapon, and that weapon falls into a criminals hands and a violent crime is committed. Wouldn't a registration be helpful? And in some cases wouldn't the owner be held accountable if he/ she were negligent?

Nothing to do with politics, mentioned to you several times, independent here.. not a lib or a BAGGER.

7 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

horatio

Apr-26-13 4:25 PM

"you mistake me for having a thought process like yours.Not true" At long last,we can find something to agree upon.

6 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Marmel

Apr-26-13 4:18 PM

"I told you about it before,please consider it.I know you won't,but I,unlike those of YOUR ilk, care about my fellow human beings."

How do you care about your fellow human being by taking away freedom and supporting more authoritarian control over your fellow human being. That logic escapes me.

How is the fruits of liberal policy in the nations growing ghettos, record on government assistance caring for your fellow human??? That logic escapes me!

The Obama administration has said that their gun control bill will not lessen the likelihood of mass shootings or violent crime. So explain your philosophy their.

3 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Marmel

Apr-26-13 4:12 PM

"Marmel,please sir/madam,you are embarrassing your self.You want sources and statistics,and then claim all the sources and statistics are irrelevant because they do not come from the official"

LOL! seems you are afraid to read the actual poll you source. Verify it nitwit. I looked up the poll and posted the details of it.

You mistake me for having a thought process like yours. Not true! I do not lie to myself. All the info is there for you to digest, go see for yourself.

I find it amusing that none of you vet any of your sources, yet when others do you cover your ears and eyes and whine like babies. That's on par for liberal behavior, delusional!

2 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

horatio

Apr-26-13 3:19 PM

Marmel,please sir/madam,you are embarrassing your self.You want sources and statistics,and then claim all the sources and statistics are irrelevant because they do not come from the official "marmel approved" source.Psych 101 "projection".I told you about it before,please consider it.I know you won't,but I,unlike those of YOUR ilk, care about my fellow human beings.Your socio-economic status must give you some degree of comfort,but enlightenment has thus far eluded you.I wish you the best in discovering other ,less narrow ways of perceiving the events in life.

6 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Marmel

Apr-26-13 3:01 PM

90% of people polled in the liberal Northeast with an almost 3-1 D-R ratio support some form of gun regulation, either existing or new.

Liberals interpretation – 90% of Americans support Barack Obama’s new Gun Control Bill

Reallytarded, Featherbrains, Hartiotack and the flock say “90 pocent dove UUUmaricons want nu gun control, it tis u fact. Tee we tink fo ourtelves”

2 Agrees | 6 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Marmel

Apr-26-13 2:42 PM

Your right reallytarded! All the democrats were busy at the gay parades or selling dope, or smoking dope, or collecting welfare.

2 Agrees | 7 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Marmel

Apr-26-13 2:38 PM

Featherbrians and hartiotack must be the same person. Neither adds anything intelligent to the conversation. Of course it is to be expected. Liberals can’t really think and articulate why and how. They repeat talking points than attack and accuse other of repeating talking points. Funny, I vetted the sources you repeated. We all know the parrots on these blogs and around the country. Shouldn’t surprise anyone! The voting demographics clearly show who the retards and order taker ditch diggers are and who the thinking white collar workers are. Keep pretending it is the other way around numskulls, has worked out beautifully in the Valley.

2 Agrees | 7 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

featherstone

Apr-26-13 1:54 PM

Your boring marmot ( small burrowing rodent).

Nice day, why don't you take a break from the conservative talk and take your pet RodThonger.

Horatio nailed it. Marmel is a parrot, just repeats the brainwashing garbage that has seeped into his shallow brain.

Marmel is crafty, maybe even intelligent in a way, but lacks the ability to be objective, creative and think for him or itself.

6 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

featherstone

Apr-26-13 1:53 PM

Your boring marmot ( small burrowing rodent).

Nice day, why don't you take a break from the conservative talk and take your pet RodThonger.

Horatio nailed it. Marmel is a parrot, just repeats the brainwashing garbage that has seeped into his shallow brain.

Marmel is crafty, maybe even intelligent in a way, but lacks the ability to be objective, creative and think for him or itself.

7 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

reallytiredofit

Apr-26-13 1:42 PM

There were no Democrats there, Just saying ya know.

5 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

reallytiredofit

Apr-26-13 1:41 PM

So Marmalade, Are you saying you ate dinner with Former Republican Senator Larry Craig, in the stall of the airport in Minnesota?

6 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Marmel

Apr-26-13 12:36 PM

Where were the reservations mamble, Old Country Buffet or Short Stop? How many scratch offs you buy and rub off in your mobile casino, your car?

No, didn't want to be in the same company as democrats

2 Agrees | 6 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Marmel

Apr-26-13 12:25 PM

The poll you are all referencing was a Quinnipiac poll that doesn’t list the complete data. Sample size was very, very small and it was conducted in NJ, Vermont and eastern PA and very heavily weighted democrat.

The question about background checks was this do you favor background checks at gun shows?"

Implying there are none currently (wrong).

Not only is this a false premise, it does not support the idea that 90% support gun control.

So liberals take the answer to mean that 90% of the country is in agreement with Obama’s plan. When people are agreeing to a generic question of a situation that already exists.

How many of you geniuses actually dissect information? Seems all you do is accept something as long as the lie fits your warped philosophy. PROVEN!

So 90% may agree with at least one of the different aspects of gun regulations, existing or new, but only 4% think it is of any importance.

Go feast on crow sheep people of the valley

2 Agrees | 6 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Marmel

Apr-26-13 12:16 PM

@ the flock member heartiotack. Nice to see you dodged the facts and ramble like a little loser boy, which I expect from your ilk. Your reference to Carl Rove just further illustrates your childlike, cheerleader approach to politics which is not result driven but "na, na, nana, na" driven.You have no sense of reality moron. All you have to do is look at your Valley and look at your ballot and see who you vote for. Nuff said Corky.

2 Agrees | 6 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

featherstone

Apr-26-13 9:55 AM

Marmy did mix it up a little here but several patterns on the avg with schizo.

6 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Showing 25 of 196 comments Show More Comments
 
 
 

 

I am looking for: